Thanks for the info. And network hardware? The more gb transfer the
hardware supports, the better or is there a point where it doesn't
matter much anymore?
On 7/21/24 12:01 PM, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
Well,
x2go compresses images using the CPU. So in theory the CPU affects the
performance. And then you have the cache on disk. As that gets loaded
on session startup/reconnect a very slow disk will increase the time
for session startup and also for session suspension/shutdown when the
cache is stored on disk (which might also happen during the session
but I have never looked into that).
However, these limitations are more or less theoretical. NX has been
developed more than 20 years ago so on today's hardware the
limitations are not relevant.
Uli
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:47 AM sjomae <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering, what other hardware components besides network
hardware, determines the performance of x2go?
Regards,
/s
_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
