Thanks again for the advice.

Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Xalan 1.4 vs. 1.3 and ICU






Hi Thomas,

I'd say you should either stay with 1.3, or move to the latest CVS.  There
have been a number of bugs fixed since 1.3, but there were several ugly
regressions, although they were edge-cases.

The latest CVS is also a bit rocky, as I've added C++ namespace support to
keep up with the support added to the parser.  Hopefully, in a few weeks,
that will settle down.  I'll be doing an interim build of the latest CVS
within the week, so you could take a look at that once it's ready.

Dave



 

                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                      oftware.com                      To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                                       cc:

                      12/03/2002 11:01 AM              Subject: RE: Xalan
1.4 vs. 1.3 and ICU                                                   
 





Thanks for the advice.

I guess I can query bugzilla to see which bugs have been fixed since Xalan
1.4, but anything major enough that you think we should look at or is it
still ok to assume that Xalan 1.4 is of good quality (at least as good as
1.3) ?

Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Xalan 1.4 vs. 1.3 and ICU






Hi Thomas,

It's certainly possible, but you'll have to use an earlier version of the
ICU, as later versions are not source code compatible, due to changes in the
ICU.

It would be better to sort out the problems you're having moving to Xalan
1.4.  There were some bugs that have been fixed since then, so you might
want to try the latest CVS code.

Dave





                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                      oftware.com                      To:
[email protected]

                                                       cc:      (bcc: David
N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
                      12/03/2002 10:21 AM              Subject: Xalan 1.4
vs. 1.3 and ICU






I'd like a recommendation from anyone with similar experience if possible.
We are currently using Xalan1.3 without ICU. We need to integrate ICU (for
NLS support) and we decided to upgrade at the same time to Xalan 1.4. It
seems that this move is not as seamless as one could hope :-) Some of our
problems are coming from some behavior differences between Xalan 1.3 and 1.4
(I am sending a separate email on that one), and some others may be from ICU
(not sure yet). Since we are under some time pressure, we were considering
moving to ICU without upgrading Xalan yet (stay with Xalan 1.3 but add ICU).
Any ideas if it is a good move or not?

Thomas



Reply via email to