Hi Berin,
Yes, there's been some talk about creating a xalan-c-dev list, but I worry
it will be such a low traffic list that people will ignore it.
I've already fixed the bug about ordering the "attributes." We can't
create two lists because we need to make sure the nodes are created in the
proper order, so the indexes are assigned correctly. I don't think the
overhead for going through the list twice is that great. If it turns out
to be a problem, we can probably come up with a better solution. One
possibility is to make the index mutable, so we can create the nodes, sort
them, then re-index them.
As far as who can be assigned bugs, it doesn't really matter. However, if
you're interested in becoming a committer at some point, you can start
assigning bugs to yourself! (Yes, that's a subtle hint...)
Dave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om.au> To:
[email protected]
cc: (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
01/20/2003 02:27 Subject: Attribute ordering
PM
David,
Has there been any thought about creating a
Xalan-c-dev? The xalan-dev list has such a
high volume from the Java version that's it's
tough to wade through given an already huge mail
box.
Real question - do you want me to raise a
separate bug report for the attribute/namespace
ordering issue you mentioned? The suggestion
about parsing twice seems sensible, although
could you build two lists at once and then append
one to t'other?
I'm having a look at the namespace issue
(although have left the bug as unassigned as am
not sure of the protocol).
Cheers,
Berin
This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au