Erik,
The classes involved in wrapping the DOM_Nodes are
probably not really that "thick". However, they
are still standalone within the library, so if
you wanted to pull them out there shouldn't be
any great problem.
Cheers,
Berin
>
> From: "Erik Rydgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Xalan with Xerces 2.2.0 idom
> Date: 05/06/2003 17:50:16
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Berin! Thanks for the reply.
>
> It is possible then just to cut away all code in Xalan that references the
> depricated DOM?
>
> / Erik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 5 juni 2003 09:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Xalan with Xerces 2.2.0 idom
>
>
> Erik,
>
> Yes - Xalan 1.5 supports both the deprecated DOM
> (DOM_Node) and the newer DOM (DOMNode) classes.
>
> There are a bunch of "wrapper" classes that
> correspond to the "bridge" classes that were used
> to map between the deprecated DOM and XalanDOM.
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
> >
> > From: "Erik Rydgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Xalan with Xerces 2.2.0 idom
> > Date: 05/06/2003 16:51:59
> > To: <xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org>
> >
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Is it possible to use Xerces 2.2.0 IDOM classes with Xalan? The 1.5 Xalan
> > code includes the depricated Xerces DOM API. We have already migrated from
> > the old DOM to the new IDOM in our company for the speed factor and would
> > like to avoid the extra bagage the depricated DOM would become.
> >
> > Is there some work done to use the IDOM instead?
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Erik Rydgren
> > Mandarinen systems AB
> > Sweden
> >
> >
>
> This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
>
>
This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
