> G'day all, > > Has anyone seen the following with the latest CVS checkout on linux > using gcc 2.95.4?
No, we've pretty much given up on 2.95.4. I think Xerces-C is also problematic on that version as well, so we're probably not losing anything. Are there still platforms where something in the 2.95.x series is the default compiler? > If you increase -ftemplate-depth-NN it compiles (takes some time but > works). I don't see this problem on gcc 3.x (although I've only tried > with a couple of versions. > > I think it may need a test in configure, but I think it may be a bit of > a bugger to write - although we could just try compiling this file I > suppose :>. I'm not sure how I would want to do this. We can probably come up with a test file that instantiate a bunch of our new template classes just to push things past 17. By the way, I wonder who chose _that_ magic number? Matt, do you have an opinion? Thanks! Dave
