Makes sense to me. I just wanted to note the problem and
see what could be one.
Thanks,
Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I disagree - a simple typo doesn't qualify for a 'slipstream'
> build, IMO. Putting out a whole new distro implies we've tested it to some
> degree, and adds extra support costs for the future for each shipped build.
>
> What we can do is fix the bug (which you did), and in this case we can
> refresh the website, so people looking online will see the fix. Don, how
> much work is it for you to rebuild the docs with Tom's change and then
> re-publish to xml.apache.org?
>
> Other comments?
> - Shane
>
> P.S. Good for finding the right xml doc source file - they're not always
> intuitive to place at first. Just be careful to always do an xsltc.docs
> (or docs) build before checking in, since errors in the xml (or mis-uses of
> some of the stylebook stuff we use) can break the build.
>
> ---- you Tom Amiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ---
> > Sorry for not picking this up earlier, but Scott Fordin
> > noticed a glaring typo in the todo list for XSLTC: The
> > todo list refers to XSLTC as XCLTC.
> >
> > I dug around and found the source xml file in the build
> > that is used to generate the todo list. Fixed the typo
> > on XCLTC and committed the file. After doing a
> >
> > build.sh xsltc.docs
> >
> > the "todo.html" file created in
> >
> > xml-xalan/build/docs/xsltc
> >
> > now says XSLTC and not XCLTC.
> >
> > Is is possible to respin the "distro" download file on xml.apache.org,
> > so those who download from this point on don't see that
> > awful misname.
> >
> > Tom
