Re: XSLTC DOMImpl class

[Scott_Boag]

There are a lot of issues.  We need to have a sit-down design session with
Morten and Todd (soon!).  I don't think we're quite ready to set a schedule
yet.  In the meantime, I don't think you want to slow down the
stabilization of XSLTC.

-scott




                                                                                       
                            
                    Shane_Curcuru                                                      
                            
                    @lotus.com           To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]              
                            
                                         cc:     (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)           
                            
                    06/06/2001           Subject:     Re: XSLTC DOMImpl class          
                            
                    10:53 AM                                                           
                            
                    Please                                                             
                            
                    respond to                                                         
                            
                    xalan-dev                                                          
                            
                                                                                       
                            
                                                                                       
                            




This sort of also begs the question: can we review the overall plan / rough
time schedule for merging the input 'sources' of XSLTC and Xalan?  The
long-term plan is to keep both transform engines (Xalan=general purpose
transformer; XSLTC=translet generator) but to merge or use common inputs
and outputs and such.

I guess (and pardon the question if we've already answered it recently): If
we're close to getting rid of the specific XSLTC DOMImpl in favor of a
merged/normal one shared with Xalan, is it worth making significant changes
to it?  Or will it be a couple of releases before we can do this, so we
might as well keep existing users happy for now?

- Shane

---- you [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ----
> hi all,
>    is it possible to add a method  'clearDOM()' (if someone hasn't
> already done it) so that the DOMImpl class
> can be reused all the time??