Hello Mr Tom,
Tom Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You might want to try dbXML. Even though we're not an in-memory
>implementation, we are an XML database, and we do quite a bit of
>in-memory caching to improve performance beyond the ability to index
>elements and element/attribute combinations. For XML-specific database
>applications, performance is quite a bit better than relational mapping.
>
>Internally, we're using Xerces for our parser and Xalan for our XPath
>implementation. A future version may also include XSLT queriable
>transformation support as well. dbXML can operate both in a
>client/server and embedded (in-VM) fashion. The software is available
>under an Apache style license.
I have gone throught the dbxml implementation.
But I dont think dbxml can support huge xml documents.
The project i was working for is a search engine,
where i need to store the query results in xml documents.
But i am trying to implement this and check the performance,.
Thanks,
Mohan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
