Scott et al --

Thomas brings up a good point here.  I'm not sure that we should always
be setting dynamic validation on.  It would be nice to have a switch in
TransformerImpl or somewhere to turn this feature off.

Thoughts?

Gary

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2124
> 
> *** shadow/2124 Tue Jun 12 07:06:17 2001
> --- shadow/2124.tmp.13338       Wed Jun 13 00:05:46 2001
> ***************
> *** 39,41 ****
> --- 39,81 ----
>   the problem?  If so, what is the problem?  Can you give an example?
>   Thanks,
>   Gary
> +
> + ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-06-13 00:05 
>-------
> + Hi,
> + here is the piece of code from TransformerFactoryImpl.java, but the same is
> + contained in other *.java files from the source:
> +
> +       try
> +       {
> +         reader.setFeature("http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/dynamic";,
> +                           true);
> +       }
> +       catch (org.xml.sax.SAXException ex)
> +       {
> +
> +         // feature not recognized
> +       }
> +
> +       reader.setContentHandler(builder);
> +       reader.parse(isource);
> +     }
> +
> + And I have attched a little example test servlet, that I will explain now.
> + Validation of the SAXParserFactory is set to true. For xerces the feature
> + http://xml.org/sax/features/validation
> + is set to true by its implementation of JAXP. I want to use it with XML Schema.
> + But it does not work because you set the feature
> + http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/dynamic to true as I mentioned above.
> +
> + Of course the bug is in Xerces because it fails with dynamic validation and XML
> + Schema but the servlet works fine with Saxon because it does not set
> + http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/dynamic to true.
> +
> + On the other hand, with such a SAXSource(XMLReader reader, InputSource) a
> + validation always will take place even if there is only a DTD subset. And of
> + course this will fail. And in my opinion it is not consitent with JAXP 1.1 Spec.
> +
> + Regards,
> +
> + Thomas
> +

Reply via email to