Joseph Kesselman wrote: > > I think we can bet that Xalan1 will not be updated to _leverage_ DOM3 > parsers. On the other hand, DOM3 should be as compatable with DOM2 > applications as DOM2 is with DOM1 -- maybe more so -- so I would hope that > Xalan1 would run against the new DOMs/parsers with few or no changes. Whether or not Xalan1 binary will run against DOM3 parsers, I can not attest. I can state, however, with certainly that Xalan1 sources will not compile against the latest source for Xerces 1.x. In fact, I am sending out daily reminders to that effect. My question is: is this something that people intend to fix, or should I simply remove Xalan1 from the daily Gump runs? - Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Joseph_Kesselman
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Scott_Boag
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Scott_Boag
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Xalan1 Sam Ruby