Gary, as far as I know the extensions should be OK now. There are a few
places where I need to go back and clean up some conversion stuff, but I'm
going to leave it for the moment. If you can, it would be a great help if
you gave it a run to see if everything seems OK for you.
I did have trouble with a test where an extension took a Long, and the
XNumber object could not be converted to a Long. As far as I can tell,
this was not due to any change with the branch merge. Is this correct?
-scott
Gary L Peskin
<garyp@firste To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ch.com> cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
Subject: Re: Retrofit of changes since
DTM work
06/14/2001
12:45 PM
Please
respond to
xalan-dev
Although I'm not familiar with the DTM stuff yet, if I can help, please
let me know. Test cases that are failing would be particularly helpful.
Gary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Later in the day today will be fine.
>
> If you haven't already discovered, there are some nasty regressions to
> extensions. The nodeset stuff in particular is a problem. I'll be
working
> on these over the next couple of days.
>
> -scott
>
>
> Gary L Peskin
> <garyp@firste To: Xalan Development
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ch.com> cc: (bcc: Scott
Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> Subject: Retrofit of changes
since DTM work
> 06/14/2001
> 11:33 AM
> Please
> respond to
> xalan-dev
>
>
>
> I am down to three sets of changes that I've made to Xalan that have not
> yet been retrofitted into the code since the DTM merge into the main
> branch.
>
> I'm planning on making those changes today. Hopefully, this will be in
> time for the 2.2D2 build. If you're planning on doing the build before
> tomorrow, please let me know and I will try to get this done as soon as
> I can today. Otherwise, I plan on doing it later in the day.
>
> Gary
