Just wanted to give you an update on progress on this.
"(ancestor::section|ancestor::simplesect|
ancestor::sect1|ancestor::sect2|ancestor::sect3 |ancestor::sect4
|ancestor::sect5)[last()]" in the "section.title" template is not executing
correctly, which I think is the problem. I think it's the grouping
operation in combination with the last() predicate that is causing the
problem. For the node in question, the full expression will return zero
nodes, which is clearly incorrect. If I simplify the expression down to
"(ancestor::section)[last()]" it returns two nodes (!!!), which is also
clearly incorrect. If I simplify this further to "ancestor::section[last
()]", it returns one node, which is fine.
-scott
bugzilla@apac
he.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
06/22/2001 Subject: [Bug 2275] - Xalan doesn't fire
the right templates
07:00 AM
Please
respond to
xalan-dev
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2275
*** shadow/2275 Thu Jun 21 21:49:57 2001
--- shadow/2275.tmp.18846 Fri Jun 22 04:00:28 2001
***************
*** 29,31 ****
--- 29,36 ----
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-06-21 21:49
-------
Norm, I'll start looking at this first thing in the morning.
+
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-06-22
04:00 -------
+ FYI: I noticed last night that you get the same bug if you use test.xsl
(instead
+ of testdiff.xsl), so that makes the test case marginally simpler :-)
+
