[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Only
> giving people on the mailing list one day to review a major change like
> this is waaaay to short a vote period.
I gave the initial notice for this over two months ago.
> -- Do any users really want to see more Xalan-J 1.x builds? If so, are
> some of our users therefore volunteering to actually do the work here?
If
> not, great, let's have a party and declare 1.x dead.
I was under the impression we already had that party.
> One admitted difficulty with xml-xalan is that the 1.x code was
> rooted at the top level, which makes it hard to separate from other bits
of
> xalan.
Right. So let's fix it.
> -- I'd like to see a decent vote/comment period go by, and then unless
> anyone complains, a backup of the full Xalan-J 1.x CVS repository (not
just
> the files, but the whole repository) made, and then (with aid of a CVS
> expert) actual filesystem removal of all files relating to Xalan-J 1.x
> (i.e. not just CVS putting them in the attic, but actually deleting the
> repository files).
Why?
> -- At that point, I would think users could then easily do separate CVS
> checkouts of 'xml-xalan/java', 'xml-xalan/test' and 'xml-xalan/c' easily.
Yes.
-scott
