Hi all,

At long last (one week) this is the patch I've made for bug 2468:

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=326

I'm curious to know if anyone is following my patches or bug reports. I
havn't heard from _anyone_ regarding the patches (except for Ovidiu who
kindly pointed out a cvs setting I should've known that helps integrate
patches). These patches are important to get xsltc to work with an xsl
project here at Schemasoft. I've not noticed any other patches being
discussed - which I understood was part of the process for patch
integration. Perhaps I'm mistaken about the process used for xml-xalan?
Perhaps there are no other anoncvs developers developing patches?

Yours newbiely,

john

-----Original Message-----
From: John Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Notice for 2.2.0 G/A


Oops, I forgot to mention an additional patch I submitted dealing with the
preceding axis iterator - in particular an off-by-one error in the
implementation of setStartNode(int):

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1407

Also in this iterator I've noticed a typo that would lead to reset()
functioning incorrectly:

--- DOMImpl.java        2001/06/12 13:22:05     1.11
+++ DOMImpl.java        2001/07/03 22:13:47
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@
        // redefine NodeIteratorBase's reset
        public NodeIterator reset() {
            _node = ROOTNODE;
-           _spStart = _sp;
+           _sp = _spStart;
            return resetPosition();
        }

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:29 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Notice for 2.2.0 G/A
> 
> 
> Has anyone had a look at the patches I've submitted? They 
> resolve problems
> we've found in xsltc using the xsl we're developing:
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2343
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1407
> 
> I'm also continuing to track down the following problem (and 
> enjoying it
> very much!):
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2468
> 

Reply via email to