So are you saying that <col> is a reserved element name and can not
be used in the document ?? Is this behavior across namespaces or
contained within the default namespace.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I would get the correct tree except that the <col> node was only an
> >open tag, there was no corresponding close tag. While trying to debug
> >the problem, I changed the depth to make col at the same level as
> >column-header and it was still broken, then I changed the name and it
> >worked just fine.
> >A grep through the source shows that the xsltc code defines "col" along
> >with a few other strings. Is it true ??
>
> That's probably the list of elements specified in section 16.2 of the
> XSLT spec.
> .................David Marston
