PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2639
*** shadow/2639 Thu Jul 19 10:39:08 2001
--- shadow/2639.tmp.4951 Wed Jul 25 11:20:42 2001
***************
*** 156,158 ****
--- 156,166 ----
Myriam
+
+
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-07-25 11:20 -------
+ Just as a sidenote, there is no need for the cost of a
+ multiply here: ((x<<1)+x) is dirt-cheap and completely
+ equivalent to 3*x ... this is a standard-issue trick in
+ performance-critical code. Possibly the compiler even
+ optimizes 3*x to this anyway.
