Scott is going to be working tomorrow on a real fix so that you should
be able to revert back to your original code when he's done.

Gary

John Gentilin wrote:
> 
> I just wanted to know if your workaround was going to
> be the fix or if there was a more "correct" fix. I don't
> mind changing the code, just wanted to know if there
> was more to test. The workaround works as it did before,
> just with the workaround.
> 
> Gary L Peskin wrote:
> 
> > Scott --
> >
> > I'm a little backed up on an important project for work at the moment.
> > If you have time, that would be great.  Otherwise I should be freed up
> > late Friday/early Monday.
> >
> > John --
> >
> > Use the workaround for now.  In what way does this not work as it did
> > before?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Dunno.  Gary, what's your summary at this point?  Do you want to try
> > > something or should I?
> > >
> > > > but it still
> > > > does not work as it did before.
> > >
> > > I would like it to work as before.  To date, I don't think any work has
> > > been done to make it so.
> > >
> > > -scott

Reply via email to