PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1696

*** shadow/1696 Tue Aug  7 03:31:06 2001
--- shadow/1696.tmp.19326       Tue Aug  7 09:24:18 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | org.apache.xml.utils.FastStringBuffer causes a StringIndexOutOfBoundsExcep |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 1696                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 2.0.1                   |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
  |     Priority: High                      Component: org.apache.xml.utils    |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | org.apache.xml.utils.FastStringBuffer causes a StringIndexOutOfBoundsExcep |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 1696                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 2.0.1                   |
! |   Resolution: FIXED                      Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
  |     Priority: High                      Component: org.apache.xml.utils    |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 27,29 ****
--- 27,33 ----
  ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-07 03:31 -------
  Just classifying bugs as Keywords:APIBug == bugs that pertain to specific API 
  calls or advanced usage of Xalan.
+ 
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-07 09:24 -------
+ I believe this was fixed since the 2.2.d8 version of the code has the suggested 
+ fix.
\ No newline at end of file

Reply via email to