PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3047

*** shadow/3047 Wed Aug  8 12:01:07 2001
--- shadow/3047.tmp.9627        Wed Aug  8 16:03:19 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | Xalan failing to escape non UTF-8 characters                               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3047                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 2.1.0                   |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: Sun                     |
  |     Severity: Major                    OS/Version: Solaris                 |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Xalan                   |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | Xalan failing to escape non UTF-8 characters                               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3047                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 2.1.0                   |
! |   Resolution: INVALID                    Platform: Sun                     |
  |     Severity: Major                    OS/Version: Solaris                 |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Xalan                   |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 54,56 ****
--- 54,69 ----
  
  So I would expect to see the two bytes 195 and 188, in order, written to your 
  UTF-8 output. If that isn't what we're doing, that would indeed be a bug.
+ 
+ 
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-08 16:03 -------
+ What Joe said is correct.  There is no need or requirement to escape the 
+ character 252.  We used to do this way back when, but had lots of complaints, 
+ mainly because it is the wrong thing to do.
+ 
+ A test with the latest CVS code outputs 0xC3 0xBC, exactly as Joe specified.
+ 
+ We should only escape characters if they can't be represented in the given 
+ encoding or they somehow get in the way of the markup.  Note that via the 
+ XMLEntities.res file you should be able to control escaping for specific 
+ characters.
\ No newline at end of file

Reply via email to