I may have found the source of the problem.
In XalanSourceTree\XalanSourceTreeParserLiaison.cpp
there are two instances of parseXMLStream()
This one,
void
XalanSourceTreeParserLiaison::parseXMLStream(
const InputSource& theInputSource,
ContentHandler& theContentHandler,
DTDHandler* theDTDHandler,
LexicalHandler* theLexicalHandler,
const XalanDOMString& /* theIdentifier */)
contains the line
theReader->setFeature(
validationString,
m_xercesParserLiaison.getUseValidation());
however
XalanDocument*
XalanSourceTreeParserLiaison::parseXMLStream(
const InputSource& inputSource,
const XalanDOMString& /* identifier */)
doesn't.
I added it and validation worked ok using testXSLT but it reported a load
of memory leaks.
I don't know if this is the problem but I'll add it to the bug report.
Another question, Is it possible to set validation using the
XalanTransformer class? I don't see that it is but it would be useful.
Paul
At 10:51 22/08/01 -0400, you wrote:
>I don't think this has anything to do with Win98 -- it's probably something
>related to changes in Xerces. It shouldn't have anything to do with the
>stylesheet and you can now use the VALIDATE option even if you're
>stylesheet doesn't have a DTD, because we no longer turn on validation for
>stylesheet processing.
>
>Can you reduce the problem to a minimal set of documents and enter a bug
>into bugzilla?
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul
> Emberson
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: (bcc: David N
> Bertoni/CAM/Lotus)
> 08/22/2001 06:22 Subject: Validation
> problems with XalanC v1.2
> AM
>
> Please
> respond
>
> to
> xalan-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Dear all,
>
>I have a stylesheet which relies on default attributes specified in the
>dtd, specified in the DOCTYPE of an input xml document. Using testXSLT
>with v1.1 this worked. Now it doesn't. (It only looks at attributes
>explicitly written in the input document.)
>
>I have tried using the -VALIDATE argument. However my XSL document doesn't
>
>have a DTD. Is this the reason? Is there anyway to only validate the xml
>document? (From command line or through the API.) There seems to be no
>difference when using the -VALIDATE option. There are never any errors
>thrown up even when the XML document is invalid (but still well formed).
>
>Validation using xerces samples works. (e.g sax2count -v=always will throw
>
>up errors if the xml is invalid.)
>
>I'm using Win98 which Xalan doesn't explicitly support. Could it be
>causing a problem here?
>
>Many thanks,
>
>Paul Emberson
