PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3238

*** shadow/3238 Wed Aug 22 16:39:25 2001
--- shadow/3238.tmp.29455       Thu Aug 23 16:38:46 2001
***************
*** 1,5 ****
  +============================================================================+
! | incorrect results for predicates applied to parameters in the select of a  |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3238                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
  |       Status: NEW                         Version: CurrentCVS              |
--- 1,5 ----
  +============================================================================+
! | for-each, xpath-iterators and template parameters (oh my!)                 |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3238                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
  |       Status: NEW                         Version: CurrentCVS              |
***************
*** 102,105 ****
          102030
  
  ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-22 16:39 -------
! Possibly related to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
--- 102,131 ----
          102030
  
  ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-22 16:39 -------
! Possibly related to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-23 16:38 -------
! I now think this bug has more in common with 
! http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2468 
! 
! It appears to me that bug #2468 is indicative of a category of problems with 
! the runtime (that of how xpath iterators are reset). I am guessing that the 
! (compiler) patch applied to #2468 is enough for that particular case but 
! insufficient for the category.
! 
! I'm suspecting that the problems stem from (most) iterators that implement 
! setStartNode(int) with different codepaths between clones and non-clones. 
! Consider for-each::translate(): the loop's iterator is reset prior to the 
! looptest but depending upon the cloneness of the iterator setStartNode(int) may 
! reset the iterator incorrectly (the committed patch for #2468 determines if a 
! call to setStartNode(int) should be generated by checking the type of the for-
! each argument - in that case, if the argument is of ReferenceType). Of course 
! this patch addresses only those cases where the argument can be inferred at 
! compiletime to be a clone (as in the case of a ReferenceType). For the current 
! bug, the argument is of NodeSetType and provides no helpful information on how 
! to reset it. It would appear that more runtime work is needed - perhaps more 
! iterator state/context information is needed.
! 
! As an aside, can anyone explain why (most) clones of iterators aren't 
! restartable? Isn't a clone of an iterator a deep copy of the iterator's context?
! 

Reply via email to