PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3260

*** shadow/3260 Fri Aug 24 09:22:40 2001
--- shadow/3260.tmp.21918       Fri Aug 24 12:33:46 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | Attributes not handled correctly by Xalan                                  |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3260                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 2.0.0                   |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Major                    OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: org.apache.xalan.transf |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | Attributes not handled correctly by Xalan                                  |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3260                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 2.0.0                   |
! |   Resolution: WORKSFORME                 Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Major                    OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: org.apache.xalan.transf |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 41,44 ****
  <DADSNAME>Son</DADSNAME>
  
  Xalan is picking up name attribute of Child element rather than Parent.  Should 
! be: <DADSNAME>Dad</DADSNAME>
--- 41,49 ----
  <DADSNAME>Son</DADSNAME>
  
  Xalan is picking up name attribute of Child element rather than Parent.  Should 
! be: <DADSNAME>Dad</DADSNAME>
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-24 12:33 -------
! I wrote a new test AXES116 to check that we get the correct node-sets for 
! expressions of this type. Additional value-of experimentation showed no
! problem in 2.2D9, so it's probably fixed.

Reply via email to