Re: Contention on Class Loader for Extensions class

[Gary L Peskin]

> "Boysko, Glenn" wrote:
> 
> Gary:
> 
> Thanks for your response.  I will try to quantify the actual cost of
> the current
> implementation.  I would think that a more efficient implementation
> would incur
> this class loading cost once per thread...

I'm not sure how you'd do this.  We should only be doing it once per
transform.  Multiple transforms on the same thread can use different
transformers so I'm not sure what you'd do.  I don't think you're
incurring much cost.  Once the classloader sees that it's already
loaded, it should return with the previously loaded version.

Unless I'm not understanding something, which is entirely possible.

Gary