Heretical? Why? It's not like an editor war or anything 8-} Actually, xml-commons is really a set of small projects (or that's the future goal) so the .jar here is not necessarily going to be the only output from xml-commons. Also, we had a vote a while back on 'what name should an uber-jar of XML standards files be called' and the result was 'xml-apis.jar'. viz.: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-apache-general&m=99075598303192&w=2 et. al.
- Shane Stay tuned on commons for my upcoming ClassWhicher idea... --- you [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ---- > > In an attempt to provide real-life code examples of use of the > > xml-commons project, we've updated the xml-xalan build process to now > > produce an xml-apis.jar and a xalan.jar > Possibly heretical question: Is there a good reason that the xml-commons > jarfile is not called xml-commons.jar?
