We are using only the very basic Trax API with XML SAX input and a stylesheet. We aren't doing any special API calls, but we are still having very serious performance problems.
Chris Geert Poels wrote: >My previous statement of "Xalan is slow" was definitely too wide. >We're only using the XPath part. (XPathAPI class in fact) > >XPathAPI.selectNodeList >XPathAPI.selectSingleNode > >and then of course usual stuff like >.item(index).getAttributes().getNamedItem >child.getNodeValue() > >The difference in speed is really huge between 2.1 and 2.2 betas. > > >>I am hoping to do some performance analysis myself this week some time >>to try to find out why Xalan 2.2 is so much slower than 2.1 in our >>environment. I'll let you know if I find anything interesting. I am >>hoping it is something isolated that can be worked around. >> > > >
