>> Isn't it possible to get the functionality from 2.2D10 back with > xmlns:xml support? > > It is. The question is just how best to approach it. > > I can put in a short-term kluge to special-case that node and bypass the > bug it exposed. Or I can try to fix the real bug, which is probably going > to have to be done anyway, but that involves broader design issues.
Well, I think it�s uo to you what way you go. The only thing I can say is that it is realy critical for the xml-security project (and other XML Signature implementations as well if they want to use the up-to-date-version of Xalan). Anyway, thanks for your work and help on Xalan, Christian
