DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5305>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5305 Incremental parsing hard-coded to 'on' in command-line tool ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-12-07 06:33 ------- There are two places where incremental parsing may be requested in Process.java. 1) If no output filename is supplied (ie, if we're writting to standard output rather than having specified a -OUT filename), we automatically switch into incremental, on the theory that in this situation the user probably wants low latency. 2) The recently introduced -INCREMENTAL command-line switch allows requesting this explicitly even when outputting to a file. The two chunks of code are setting the flag in slightly different ways but I think the result should be equivalent. Now that we have -INCREMENTAL available, we might want to consider removing the automatic incremental-if-stdout feature. But I'm somewhat worried about having that break the expectations of folks who have been using Process.java to generate webserver output, and who may have been assuming the low-latency behavior will be selected. It wasn't officially documented, so we can change it... but I think we need to check with the community before altering it. Another alternative would be to add a -NOINCREMENTAL switch, so the "helpful" default could remain unchanged but folks could override it.
