> Please, Stefano. No offense taken, and I was not trying to > be defensive. > I agree 100% that XSLTC is an ideal choice for high performance > applications. If I didn't think so it wouldn't have been > brought into the > Xalan project. We put a lot of our hopes into XSLTC. I > agree 100% with > your conclusions.
I also have been desperately waiting for to technology like XSLTC becoming production quality. In my special case I have DOMs as input format for stylesheets and xml sources. So I pass them to XSLTC wrapped in DOMSource objects. I investigated the XSLTC sources a little bit and noticed that a conversion is done to SaxSource using the DOM2SAX adapter. I assume that this conversion is pretty expensive. Runtime measurement of the XSL transformations seem to proove this. Is this true? I'd really love to leverage the power of XSLTC.
