Very good question. I would love to bring them in line.
> I'd be more than happy to submit this... I would love to see this submitted and integrated. Can we keep the older XSLTC extensions support for backwards compatibility? Interested in thoughts from Todd and Santiago, etc. The other BIG issue for both engines is EXSLT (http://www.exslt.org/) support. I think we must support this. I would like to get volunteers to work on it. Any takers? -scott "Sayeau, Derek" <Derek.Sayeau@Cog To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nos.COM> cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: XSLTC: Enhanced extension function support 03/06/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to xalan-dev Hi, I'm wondering what the status/plan is on enhancing the extension function support in XSLTC? Will there be more robust support in next release (for example being able to specify packages). Locally I've modified my version of XSLTC to support Xalan style extension functions, so that I can easily switch between the two processors, and work at a package level when specifying classes. I'd be more than happy to submit this... Cheers, -derek ............................................................................ . Derek Sayeau 3755 Riverside Drive Information Delivery Ottawa, ON Cognos Inc. K1G 4K9 (613) 738-1338 ext. 5097 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ............................................................................ . This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.
