Hi Anthony,
The fixes for supported() vs. isSupported() are already in CVS, so you
might want to build and test with the latest code.
Dave
"Anthony
Zawacki" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
om> Subject: RE: The old version
switcheroonie.
03/13/2002 04:31
AM
Please respond
to xalan-dev
Hi David,
I performed this exercise yesterday, and the only thing I ran into was
several calls to the Xerces Dom routine .supports()... The latest release
of Xerces has changed it to isSupported().
It looked like XalanClass::supports(feature, version) { return
XercesClass::supports(feature, version); }
Now it looks like this for my build:
XalanClass::supports(feature, version) { return
XercesClass::isSupported(feature, version); }
I'm still testing to see if the release works correctly.
Anthony
...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
Hello, David.
> I try my best to keep up with the latest Xerces code. The last refresh I
> did was about a week ago, so you shouldn't have a problem building Xalan
> from CVS against Xerces 7.0.
>
> If you're waiting for binary releases, that may take some time. The
> Xalan-C++ team is down to just me, and doing builds and getting the
> distributions prepared is a big job. Of course, if anybody out there is
> interested in helping, feel free to volunteer. In particular, if there's
> someone who has a RedHat 7.2 box with gcc 2.96 on it, I'm looking
> for a new Linux build machine. I promise to be a good citizen if someone
> can give me a login, or if someone wants to do the build themself.
>
> I'm predicting there will be builds available in about 2 weeks, but that
> depends on what my testing against the Xerces 1.7 release reveals.
>
Thank you very much with your answer. I think I'll upgrade to Xerces 1.7
myself, and see what happens. If it works, it's good, and if not... well
that's a form of testing.
BTW, I really appreciate the work you've put in to the project as well -
especially since it's down to your lonesome. Thanks for that as well.
> Dave
Regards,
Peter.
