DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9959>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9959 All extensions should use same namespace URI ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-18 20:53 ------- Shane: I assume that when you say "general extension namespace", you mean the one that would be used by all extension functions, extension instructions (like redirect), and extension top-level elements (if we have any). I would think that extension attributes (like indent-amount) would also go here. I agree that extensions that could apply to standalone XPath or DTM should be in the same namespace. PIs cannot be namespaced, so they are out of scope for this bug. (PIs can be qualified via "notations" if anyone cares.) Should the SQL extension functions be in with the others? I think so.
