+1 Regards -Ramesh
>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Subject: [VOTE:] Nomination of Ilene Seelemann for PMC Member (was xml.apache.org refactoring #1 - expansion of PMC) >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:58:23 -0500 >X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at 01/27/2003 01:58:26 PM, Serialize complete at 01/27/2003 01:58:26 PM >X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >Hello, > > I'd like to nominate Ilene Seelemann for PMC Member. Ilene has been >very active in the Xalan community over the past year. From my >professional contact with her, I can attest to her organizational >abilities, which would make her a valuable member of the PMC. > > I'll begin the voting with a +1. As Ted requests, please vote by >Friday, January 31. > > (As an aside, I'd like to suggest that someone who has knowledge of >XSLTC or Xalan-C++ step forward as well.) > >Thanks, > >Henry >------------------------------------------------------------------ >Henry Zongaro Xalan development >IBM SWS Toronto Lab Tie Line 969-6044; Phone (905) 413-6044 >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >----- Forwarded by Henry Zongaro/Toronto/IBM on 01/27/2003 01:43 PM ----- > > >"Ted Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >01/24/2003 03:55 PM >Please respond to xerces-c-dev > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: xml.apache.org refactoring #1 - expansion of PMC > > > >As you are no doubt aware, the ASF board has approved two new PMC's: one >for Web Services (to include Axis, SOAP, XML-RPC, and XML-Security), and >one for Cocoon. > >In keeping with the proposal that I made last week, I'd like each of the >remaining subprojects to elect 1 or 2 persons as they see fit to represent >them on the XML PMC. I would like to see these elections completed by >Friday, Jan 31. If you need vote counting support please send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The remaining active projects are: > >Axkit >Batik >Crimson >Fop >Forrest >Xalan >Xerces-J >Xerces-C >Xerces-P >Xindice > >Please send your vote results to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Ted Leung >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:12 AM >Subject: xml.apache.org refactoring #1 > >Greetings all, > >From our discussion last December, it seems clear to me that most of the >subprojects are not interested in becoming top-level projects. It also >seems clear that people are interested broad based representation in the >XML PMC. I think that the best way to improve the issues related to >project oversight is to have a series of small refactorings. So here's my >proposal for the first refactoring: > >We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to be >a part of the XML PMC. From my experience, I think that it will be better >to have 2 people rather than one in order to share workload, etc. I >believe that both Axis (is Axis planning on taking SOAP with it) and >Cocoon are in the process of creating their own PMC's. They would >obviously be exempt from this. > >I know that we're going to have some discussion about this (lets keep it >in general@) -- I encourage it -- but I've also noticed that things tend >to peter out after while and nothing happens, so I want to have an >endmarker. I propose to limit discussion on this proposal until next >Friday Jan 24. If this proposal is still being considered on the 24th, >then I'd propose that the subprojects nominate their folks by the >following Friday, Jan 31. > >Ted > >
