I cannot access the ISO site to check on this, so I thought I would ask
here. Is the month-in-year function supposed to return values on a 0-11
scale? For instance, month-in-year('0001-01-01') returns '00', and so on. I
don't think it should be that way, because both year and day return in a
1-xxx scale.
The month-name function would break in the case of
month-name(month-in-year('0001-01-01')) (obviously a rhetorical example, but
still valid), and return incorrectly for other months. In fact, any use
requires an addition of one.
I'm not putting this in bugzilla just because I'm not sure if it's a bug. If
it is, I'll post it.
Foxy
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
- Re: datetime:month-in-year function Foxy Shadis
- Re: datetime:month-in-year function Joseph Kesselman
- Re: datetime:month-in-year function mkwan
- Re: datetime:month-in-year function David Marston/Cambridge/IBM
