Yes right.
"Santiago
Pericas-Geertsen" To: "xalan-dev "
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lionel
<Santiago.PericasGeerts Villard/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Shane
Curcuru/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus
Subject: Re: Factory questions
02/06/2003 09:23 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lionel Villard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> There is no factory for these nodes.
>
Ok, in that case we should remove the invocation to createNode() in
impl.parser.SimpleNode for all the cases shown below. Right?
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISCHILD:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISATTRIBUTE:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISDESCENDANT:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISSELF:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISFOLLOWINGSIBLING:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISFOLLOWING:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISNAMESPACE:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISPARENT:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISANCESTOR:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISPRECEDINGSIBLING:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISPRECEDING:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAXISANCESTORORSELF:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTDOTDOT:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTAT:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTPLUS:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTMINUS:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTXPATH:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTXPATH2:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTDOT:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTSLASH:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTROOT:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTROOTDESCENDANTS:
case XPathTreeConstants.JJTSLASHSLASH:
-- Santiago
- Re: Factory questions Lionel Villard
- Re: Factory questions Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- Re: Factory questions Lionel Villard
- Re: Factory questions Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- Re: Factory questions Lionel Villard
- Re: Factory questions Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- Re: Factory questions Lionel Villard
