Hi Sarah, I believe we would need about a month to fix those problems. Now, if you think we can do 2.6 by the end of the year, then it's OK to wait and incorporate the changes into that version.
Regarding the code freeze for 2.5.2. Could we do it a week from today? This way it will give us time to finish and commit a few more bug fixes. Thanks. -- Santiago On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 19:11, Sarah McNamara wrote: > > > Hi Santiago, > > How much time do you think is required to address 1, 2 & 3? > > I know that there are performance issues for XSLTC that have been fixed in > cvs but > have not been officially published yet, so one motivation for doing a > release now is > to get those fixes out there. Also, looking at the description of the > changes you're > working on, we might want to do a Xalan Java 2.5.2 now, then a Xalan Java > 2.6 down > the road (end of year?) where we would publish this new function and also > move up > to the latest Xerces Java. > > What do you think? > > > Sarah McNamara > > ----- Forwarded by Sarah McNamara/Toronto/IBM on 10/16/2003 07:07 PM ----- > > > Santiago > > Pericas-Geertsen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <Santiago.PericasGeerts cc: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Xalan Java > 2.5.2 > > > 10/16/2003 05:59 PM > > Please respond to > > xalan-dev > > > > > > > > > Sarah, > > I think there are some outstanding bugs/enhancements that I would like > to see fixed in XSLTC 2.5.2. We are at a point where we are encouraging > people to use XSLTC, however there's important functionally missing when > compared to Xalan. Off top of my head: > > 1. Dynamic support to resolve external Java calls (i.e. dynamic > alternative to xsltc:cast()). > 2. Support for DOM and DOM fragments as parameters to a stylesheet. > 3. URIResolvers and general mechanism to resolve relative URIs is not > compatible with Xalan. > > I have developers looking at 1 and 2, and I have personally been > working on 3. > > One possibility is do a 2.5.2 followed by a 2.5.3 in the near future. > However, it is not clear to me that we should do this simply because > it's due. > > To summarize, I believe we should not miss the opportunity to address > 1-3 in the next release, even if that means waiting a bit more. > > -- Santiago > > On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:32, Sarah McNamara wrote: > > > > > Back in August there was a question posted to xalan-j-users regarding > > another > > release. Henry Zongaro responded to the query and suggested a > mid-October > > release > > (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xalan-j-users&m=106193733114926&w=2) > > > > So....seeing as it is mid-October and there has been quite a number of > > patches > > applied and bugs fixed in cvs, we'd like to see if we can put out a Xalan > > Java > > maintenance release early next week. The release would be called Xalan > > Java 2.5.2. > > > > We'd like to freeze the content of this release tomorrow, October 17, at > > 19:00 UTC > > (15:00 PM EDT) if there are no concerns from any of the committers. Then > > we'll tag > > the files and start the test and packaging process. > > > > Sarah McNamara > > > > > >
