BCEL is used by the XSLTC mode's code generation.
Well, sure - but *if* it's no special version of BCEL why is it included inside the Xalan jar? I'd exspect only Xalan code in there.
A soon as you have an application that used Xalan and BCEL you'll get classpath clashes.
I'd prefer to see the use of XSLTC *depend* on the a BCEL jar. But it should not be part of the Xalan jar.
What do you guys think? -- Torsten
