DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26030>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26030 Namespaces in extension-element-prefixes suppressed from output [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |TestID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-09 21:51 ------- Namespace16 is an example. We probably need another test where an xsl:element instruction attempts to create an element whose namespace is an extension element namespace. See section 14.1 of the XSLT 1.0 spec. This basically says what should be done with elements in extension element namespaces. When I read 7.1.1, I focus on: The created [LRE] node will also have a copy of the namespace nodes that were present [per the data model, all in-scope namespaces]...with the exception of ...a namespace URI declared as an extension namespace.... which says to me that it should be suppressed. I won't change the status of this, because I think someone else should assemble a complete collection of test cases around the extension-element-prefixes declaration
