DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26661>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26661 Search fail in tree with normalize-space function [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-14 08:38 ------- I continue my test and the result is the same on Windows 98 SE, Windows 2000, and now Windows XP. They are always different result between Xalan 1.5 et Xalan 1.7. I sum up and after I ask you some questions. I take very care with lines wrap. All line are under 80 characters except result files but it doesn't matter. Call: xalan -o bug_func.txt bug_func.xml bug_func.xsl Data file bug_func.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="yes"?> <A> <B/> <R1> <P><L l="d" t="d1"/><L l="f" t="f1"/><L l="e" t="e1"/></P> <P><L l="d" t="d2"/><L l="f" t="f2"/><L l="e" t="e2"/></P> </R1> <R2> <!-- change place of l="e" (3 => 2) --> <P><L l="d" t="d1"/><L l="e" t="e1"/><L l="f" t="f1"/></P> <P><L l="d" t="d2"/><L l="e" t="e2"/><L l="f" t="f2"/></P> </R2> <R3> <!-- change place of l="e" (2 => 1) --> <P><L l="e" t="e1"/><L l="d" t="d1"/><L l="f" t="f1"/></P> <P><L l="e" t="e2"/><L l="d" t="d2"/><L l="f" t="f2"/></P> </R3> </A> Script file bug_func.xsl: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";> <xsl:strip-space elements="*"/> <xsl:output method="text" encoding="ISO-8859-1"/> <xsl:template match="B"> <xsl:text>@cas R1.a Ok:"</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="/A/R1/P[L/@l='e' and L/@t='e1']/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'f']/@t"/> <xsl:text>"@cas R1.b not Ok (empty):"</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="/A/R1/P[L/@l='e' and normalize-space( L/@t)='e1']/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'f']/@t"/> <xsl:text>"@cas R2.a Ok:"</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="/A/R2/P[L/@l='e' and L/@t='e1']/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'f']/@t"/> <xsl:text>"@cas R2.b not Ok (empty):"</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="/A/R2/P[L/@l='e' and normalize-space( L/@t)='e1']/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'f']/@t"/> <xsl:text>"@cas R3.a Ok:"</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="/A/R3/P[L/@l='e' and L/@t='e1']/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'f']/@t"/> <xsl:text>"@cas R3.b Ok:"</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="/A/R3/P[L/@l='e' and normalize-space( L/@t)='e1']/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'f']/@t"/> <xsl:text>"@</xsl:text> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> Result file with Xalan 1.5 and Xerces 2.2: @cas R1.a Ok:"f1"@cas R1.b not Ok (empty):"f1"@cas R2.a Ok:"f1"@cas R2.b not Ok (empty):"f1"@cas R3.a Ok:"f1"@cas R3.b Ok:"f1"@ No bug: After the two '(empty):' you find '"f1"' Result file with Xalan 1.7 and Xerces 2.4: @cas R1.a Ok:"f1"@cas R1.b not Ok (empty):""@cas R2.a Ok:"f1"@cas R2.b not Ok (empty):""@cas R3.a Ok:"f1"@cas R3.b Ok:"f1"@ Bug: After the two '(empty):' you find '""' Xalan 1.5 Executable files: 23/04/2003 14:41 110 592 Harness_1_5_0.dll 23/04/2003 14:30 1 961 984 Xalan-C_1_5_0.dll 23/04/2003 14:43 16 384 Xalan.exe 07/02/2003 05:03 2 072 576 xerces-c_2_2_0.dll Xalan 1.7 Executable files: 14/01/2004 02:05 118 784 Harness_1_7_0.dll 14/01/2004 02:04 1 998 848 Xalan-C_1_7_0.dll 14/01/2004 02:06 24 576 Xalan.exe 14/01/2004 01:54 49 152 XalanMessages_1_7_0.dll 02/12/2003 16:25 2 490 368 xerces-c_2_4_0.dll Questions: 1- Do you find the same difference? 1a- If not, are you sure you use exactly the same executable files? The Xalan 1.7 is always on the download servers. You have the list I use juste before. 1b- If you always don't find, may I send you my Xalan 1.5 and Xalan 1.7 executable files in a zip? How can I do? There are somehting may be very important. You wrote: "I ran your stylesheet using Xalan-C 1.7, Saxon 6.5.2, msxsl 4.0" Is the same that xerces 2.4 on the download? 2- You wrote me the 'value-of' expression are wrong (Mix between node-set and string) 2a- How do you explain that I find different result between: 2aa- Xalan 1.5 and Xalan 1.7 2ab- R1.a and R1.b expression 2ac- R2.a and R2.b expression 2ad- Difference between R1.b or R2.b and the others 2b- but the same result between: 2ab- R3.a and R3.b expression You notice that: Note 1: R1.a, R2.a and R3.a are equivalent R1.b, R2.b and R3.b are equivalent Note 2: The only difference between Rx.a et Rx.b is the use of the normalize-space function. And my data type parse show that all are in a string type. >From this point of view, the normalize-space function is involute: string = normalize-space( string) If that I assume is wrong, you can't anyway explain the serial questions 2. Note 3: With Xalan 1.7, I think that the call of normalize-space break the search from the first three nodes <A><Rx><P><L l="d" t="d1"/>. This is the bug.
