DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666 ElemTemplateElement throws RuntimeException instead of TransformerException Summary: ElemTemplateElement throws RuntimeException instead of TransformerException Product: XalanJ2 Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: org.apache.xalan.templates AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The JavaDoc for the error() method in org.apache.xalan.templates.ElemTemplateElement <http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/apidocs/org/apache/xalan/templates/ElemTemplateElement.html#error(java.lang.String,%20java.lang.Object[])> asks: "Throw a template element runtime error. (Note: should we throw a TransformerException instead?)" I'm prepared to answer this: yes, Xalan should. Whil running the Xalan conformance test suite from OASIS (specifically numberformat_numberformat45 java.lang.RuntimeException: ElemTemplateElement error: Malformed format string: 000.000,###) I managed to exercise this bit of code and the RuntimeException it threw was quite a surprise. I'm still trying to figure out exactly where the bug that caused this exception to be thrown lies. In the meantime, however, my code was ready to receive a TransformerException at this point and not to receive a generic RunimeException. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
