> Hi, > > I am very interested in getting Xalan C++ libraries to work under some Red Hat 7.3 linux distribution. > > I tried to use the binaries provided in apache site, but they are compiled with the intel compiler. After > managing to find the intel c runtime libraries and installing them, I managed to run the samples but then > I realised that linking the libraries generated with the intel compiler with my gcc objects is not so > straightforward. I couldn't manage to make it.
Yes, this won't work, unless you're using only C APIs. > So I thought I would rather compile xerces and xalan from source. I tried to do this in a RHL 7.3 box > with gcc 2.96. Xerces compiles OK, but Xalan does not, the compiler crashes trying to make it. GCC 2.96 is not a true GCC release. It's buggy and you shouldn't use it for production code. > Then I thought maybe I should upgrade my servers to RHEL 3.0, or even try to make a library usable > in RHL 7.3 from RHEL 3.0. So I tried to make it with gcc 3.2.3 under RHEL 3.0, and again Xerces > compiles fine but Xalan generates heaps of warnings and in the end the build stops because of some > errors ( I can attach las lines of gcc output if someone finds it useful ). I build Xalan-C with gcc 3.2.3 regularly. I don't know what these "heaps of warnings" are, and you didn't attach any output, so it's hard to say what's wrong. > So, my question is: has anyone managed to build Xalan from sources under some Red Hat version? > Which one? Any tricky stuff needed to make it work? Redhat 8 and 9. RHEL 3.0. Fedora core 1 and 2 are some Red Hat platform I've used to build Xalan-C. > Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance for any replies, Try re-sending the output, but paste the _relevant_ part of it into an email. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
