[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2196?page=comments#action_12420766 
] 

Mark Woon commented on XALANJ-2196:
-----------------------------------

Since this appears to be a packaging issue rather than a coding issue, can't 
2.7 just be repackaged correctly instead of wating for a new release?  Pretty 
please?

> Unneeded BCEL classes in Xalan.jar (2 jar version)
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: XALANJ-2196
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2196
>      Project: XalanJ2
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Xalan
>     Versions: 2.7
>  Environment: All
>     Reporter: Eric Everman
>     Assignee: Sarah McNamara
>  Attachments: XALANJ-2196.patch.txt
>
> The binary '2 jar' distribution of Xalan includes the BCEL classes in the 
> xalan.jar.  These classes are not required for Xalan, only for XMLTC.  I 
> marked this bug as 'major' because it prevents xalan 2.7 from being used 
> under Oracle's OC4J J2EE web container, which relies on an older version of 
> BCEL and will crash if the newer version is on the classpath.
> Note that I was able to get the 2.7 version of xalan to work under OC4J by 
> using a non-public portion of the ant build script to build the xalan.jar 
> without BCEL.
> This thread on the user's discussion list has slightly more information then 
> this post:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xalan-j-users&m=112597125332553
> Sarah McNamara claims to have a patch available.
> Thanks Much,
> Eric Everman

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to