[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470722
]
Brian Minchau commented on XALANJ-2355:
---------------------------------------
Thanks to Atosa K. for clarifying this.
If the output generated is:
<?xml version='1.0'?><p1:e1 p2:a1='value1' xmlns:p1='uri1'
xmlns:p2='uri2' />
and our gold file has this:
<?xml version='1.0'?><prefix1:e1 prefix2:a1='value1' xmlns:prefix1='uri1'
xmlns:prefix2='uri2' />
The element and attribute are the same since they have the same URI. However
the elements have different namespace nodes.
The pseudo-attribute xmlns:p1='uri1' adds a namespace node associated with the
element, and this namespace node differs from the other one with
xmlns:prefix1='uri1' since the prefixes differ.
So it seems that tests that involve generated prefixes to avoid prefix
collisions are not conformance tests but acceptance tests as Dave had initially
suspected when this issue was created.
> Some namespace tests should be moved from 'conformance' to 'acceptance'
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XALANJ-2355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2355
> Project: XalanJ2
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Brian Minchau
> Fix For: The Latest Development Code
>
>
> During the Xalan-J JIRA triage on December 11, 2006 David Marston suggested
> that there might
> be tests in the namespace area that are actually 'acceptance' tests that
> should be moved out
> of the 'conformance' area.
> One such test would be due to XALANJ-2334 and XALANJ-2150.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
