Hi Steven, I don't expect anything from last year's attempt would make it into Xalan. None of the code from that project was ever contributed back to Apache. Given your analysis it doesn't sound like there's much of value in that repository anyway.
It's a shame, but I think we've all learned some valuable lessons from that experience. Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org Steve Hathaway <shath...@e-z.net> wrote on 03/25/2012 04:33:12 PM: > FYI: Java XPath-2 > > I just did a brief difference analysis of last year's GSoC 2011 > code for xalan2 and the current Apache Xalan Java trunk. > > Here are the significant changes found in the Google GSoC repository: > > 1. A refactoring of security, almost identical to what we have. > > 2. Adding stubs for XPath-2 into the function dispatch table affecting > > org/apache/xpath/compiler/KeyWords.java > org/apache/xpath/compiler/FunctionTable.java > org/apache/xpath/jaxp/XPathExpressinImpl.java > > Note: There is virtually no implementation of the XPath-2 functions. > > Sincerely, > Steven J. Hathaway > Xalan Documentation Project > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscr...@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-h...@xml.apache.org
