>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Kesselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But it would give you the ability to write first class functions. Joseph> If you think it's really that important, contact the W3C's Joseph> XSLT working group and see whether they agree it should go Joseph> into future versions of the language. (Actually, check the Joseph> XSLT 2.0 specs first; they might have anticipated this Joseph> request.) For me it was crucial really. Other things, like the terrible syntax for instance, could have been worked around. But without first class functions, the language was hobbled. I'm sure this has come up before, and I am sure the w3c working group knows about it already. Either they will fix it, or they will not. Phil
