On Tuesday, 11/26/2002 at 10:42 EST, Scott Boag/Cambridge/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Without wanting to start a thread on xml-commons, I don't think it should > go there. xml-commons should be a repository for very stable APIs and very > highly used implementation classes like perhaps a QName class. We should > always be very careful about what goes into xml-commons... otherwise you're > risking spaghetti.
Point granted... but I still think of an XPath generator as a general utility rather than as being a great fit for the Xalan project. (There's been discussion of adding an XPath generator to some future version of the DOM APIs, to match the DOM3 XPath evaluation API currenty being developed... but that's still strictly a wishlist item as far as I know.) ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
