On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 19:54, Kumar, Suraj wrote: > Use of Extension functions makes the XSL less portable as non-java > stylesheet processors won't > be able to invoke Java extensions. Besides this, I don't think there is too > much of overhead in invoking an extension function( thru reflection?) from > XSL, assuming extension functions do not have too much resource consuming > functionality.
Using the interpreter, extension functions are resolved at runtime via reflection. Using the compiler (XSLTC), extension functions are resolved at compile time. In general, there's little overhead in using extension functions (especially, when compared to alternative code written in XSLT). -- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
