Hi,

The Xalan-J 2.6.0 jar does contain the classes in org.w3c.dom.xpath. Please
check your copy of the xalan.jar file. If it does not contain the classes
under org.w3c.dom.xpath, download an offcial Xalan-J 2.6.0 release from
this site (http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/downloads.html).

It is also likely that your Xalan-J 2.6.0 jar was not picked up by your
environment. Check this FAQ
(http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/faq.html#faq-N100CC) if you use JDK 1.4.

Morris Kwan
XSLT Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Tel: (905)413-3729
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



                                                                           
             "David Israel"                                                
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                             
             com>                                                       To 
                                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,     
             04/15/2004 03:30          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      
             PM                                                         cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       missing org.w3c.dom.xpath           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Hello,

I am trying to upgrade from an old version of xalan.jar that contained
org.w3c.dom.xpath package - XPathEvaluator etc.  The 2.6.0 examples and
API still use that package but the downloaded jar files do not have it.
What is the best way for me to be able to compile with the new jars?

Thank you,
David




Reply via email to