On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Erin Harris wrote:
Hi Raymond,
1) If you are looking for conformance test results then I can
probably dig something up but I don't think there is anything for
performance.
Our internal testing shows that on average XSLTC is 2-2.5X faster
than Xalan over a set of about 40 stylesheets. The benchmark
simulates a server scenario where stylesheets are precompiled (using
Templates) and ran over a period of time in which a throughput
measure (TPS - transforms per second) is computed. In this type of
scenario, I'd expect XSLTC to easily outperform Xalan. But as the
saying goes: "your mileage may vary".
-- Santiago
2) If you go to the following page it details the limitations of
XSLTC extension support: http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/
extensions_xsltc.html
Thanks.
Erin Harris
Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/09/2007 07:19 PM
To
xalan-j-users <xalan-j-users@xml.apache.org>
cc
Subject
translets
Hey All,
1) Are there any statistical analysis between interpretive and
"translet" driven XSL processing?
Even a comparison:
Xalan XSL Interpreted VS. Xalan XSLTC Translet
would be great.
2) Are there limitations in the support of "exslt" when XSLTC
Translets?
Thanks,
Raymond Auge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Software Engineer
Liferay, Inc.
Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
