Johannes Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2007-07-29 02:10:51 PM: > Am Donnerstag, den 26.07.2007, 06:05 -0400 schrieb Henry Zongaro: > > If you're interested in such an implementation (as a user), please > > respond and let us know which features you're most interested in. And > > conversely, I would also like to hear from any users who are satisfied > > with an XSLT 1.0 processor, and not much interested in migrating to > > XSLT 2.0.
I'm pinging and reviving this thread as there hasn't been any response on this front in over a year. It's hard to believe that the Xalan corporate users don't have a need for XSLT 2.0 support. I work on the XSL Tools project at eclipse, and have several requests to add XSLT 2.0 debugging support. However, we can't use Saxon due to some obscure IP concerns, so that leaves us with no way to provide XSLT 2.0 debugging or XPath 2.0 support out of the box. XSLT 2.0 is becoming more prevelant in it's usage and adoption, for many of the reasons that have been previously mentioned. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Xalan3-XSLT-2.0-XPath-2.0-support--tp11807665p19033966.html Sent from the Xalan - J - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
