I'm guessing that since your vm memory size is 3g on unix and 200-300m on
windows, the initialization of the memory space is probably accounting for
that difference. As others have said, you should run the same test 100+
times to get a fair comparison.
dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sriram83" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <xalan-j-users@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 9:20 AM
Subject: XSL Transformation in Xalan - Pls help!
Hi,
I am facing a performance difference for XSL transformation between
Windows
and Linux.
Details of Environment:
Environment 1 [Production Environment]:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 2)
Kernel 2.6.9-22.ELsmp on an i686
Xalan version: 2.7.0
JDK: 1.5_11-b03 server edition
Min-Max memory: 3 GB
Time taken for XSL T: 700 ms
Environment 2 [My Desktop]:
MS Windows XP Service pack 2
Xalan version: 2.7.0
JDK: 1.5_11-b03
Min-Max memory: 200-300 MB
Time taken for XSL T: 280 ms
With superior hardware and same software, I would expect the production
server to be faster, but surprisingly the XSL transformation in
Environment
2 is faster.
I am using the same XML for transformation. I am at my wits end trying to
figure out the problem.
Please can someone provide any insight this?
Thanks,
Sriram
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XSL-Transformation-in-Xalan---Pls-help%21-tp19471054p19471054.html
Sent from the Xalan - J - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
